18th Moon Station

The place I worked in, seems to have a rule of thumb of picking titles. When faced with limited purchase slot, prefer long running title than short titles, even if the short titles is better. There are technical reasons, such as the difficulty of arranging new rights, and availability of products to work on. But there’s non-technical aspect too, namely, with so many products, when a title ended, it’ll most likely be forgotten by most (move on, nothing to see here). Long products will stay longer, and there’s a sticking aspect of the cash cows buying after they had invested in it (“too late to stop” thing).

Microsoft in the other hand… seems to prefer selling big titles (something like our novel publishing sister-company). Keep things in development, and release when it’s ready. Well, at least from a casual enthusiast’s point of view.

Personally… I think… I’d prefer them to do things in reverse. Thought of it while being tortured with standing, back-ache, steamed and light oxygen deprivation during the commuting trip home.

The logic in it? Well, books, I pay for those. Naturally, I want titles I’m really interested in. But I also prefer shorter stories, because I had to pay for each releases and I prefer to finish paying the investment sooner and go to the next.
Software in the other hand, at least web services, are mostly free-as-beer, so does beta software. And like beer, let it come in free flow, every drops of it in bite-sized releases. Besides, every time something new came out, we’ll come to check it right? At least out of curiosity, then talk again about it rather than always talk about the competition.

Other thing. I’ve seen a lot of case, about political issue, where peoples are quoting “experts”, as in journalists or the geeks (in social-politics). The population can’t find the right words for their emotions, so when someone coined a great arguments for their side, they take it as their own idea (and the person as sort of prophet). I think, it’s not that bad to give “geek credits” even if it’s not so much for practical use other than being “in the cutting edge”; after all, the authoritative voices are influential, and they had short patience(?). Do it for good image.

There’s a lot of web services in the internet. Quoting the release info from Windows Live Team:

For our partners, they’re great because just like other viral sharing mechanisms, they help new people discover each site’s content within the context of global services like Messenger and Hotmail that are already used by nearly 450 million people a month. And, the content being shared is more relevant and likely to be clicked on by the viewer, because it’s coming directly from their friends.

Web activities actually do more than that for me. The release assume that the users of Windows Live is already member of the services, and that it drives new peoples to come and visit.

In my experience, the availability of aggregation in sites I used is actually as important as alternate login (e.g: OpenID, Facebook Connect). If there’s aggregation for the service available, I’d be more encouraged to try those sites. For example, when I tried Fotolog,, Goodreads, Last.fm and StumbleUpon. Also, the reason I choose Digg instead of del.icio.us. Not just Windows Live, also Friendfeed (Backtype, Mixx, Tumblr) and Retaggr (CoComment).

Why? Just like the alternate login, I get something I can use for more than something in the closed garden. I can login using the key I bring from other place. For these websites, well, I can share it more widely, easily. It also gives a standard motivator to give that push on the back for curious me to try those services and try using it regularly.

The problem with the choices though. Windows Live now had more services supported than FriendFeed, but the choices is dominated by services popular in a specific local market. That’s why I find more than half are services I’ll never actually use.

最近は見なかったな. 忙しいのかな?

アプローチは激し過ぎかな? 別にそういうつもりは無いのに. でも, プライベートの日常を知りたいのもさすがに拙かった?

これは初めてじゃないから, いいか.

Went to watch 2012 today, or as I tried saying in Twitter, watch Roland Emmerich try to destroy humanity once more from the face of this planet.

Personally, the self-made comment I remember about… “Jackson, Gordon, you two could try and be danmaku pilot” Although the intensity of the projectiles and obstacles is nothing the level of Touhou games.

Anyway, after a long day with company-recommended medical check up, short date, oh, and stepping on dog shit (literally) in the morning to be troubled by it all day long; bought the ticket. I was lucky to watch it alone, because other than a single seat by the left aisle on the third lane from behind, the next available seat is at the front most, and even that is scarce.

In going to the movie, I’m welcomed by rain, I think rank 3 out of 5 where 10 is the hard rain with strong wind but still weaker than F-scales. I’m expecting to be greeted by… something not as spectacular as daybreak as in the movie, but at least the rain stopped.

Naah… met with an elementary school’s classmate opening a Blackberry accessories store in the mall and we get into short talk, although I think I’m becoming the annoying-talkative again. Must be my habit, compressing the whole topic to prepare for short time window even if I had more. But that’s it, the mood of welcoming the outdoor is gone :P

Timeline, stream, the popular format of conveying thoughts isn’t it.

From the time when blogs came, and change websites based on hierarchical document structure into long page going to the next long pages with articles stacked on another FIFO. Then Facebook’s feed, Twitter’s timeline too.

I guess, in BBS it’s called… “flat”, everything in one surface. I’d use the term, 1-dimensional, because like Timeline it is, this form has only length and simple back-reference to point on what is being replied.

What’s two dimensional? Well, Facebook and Friendfeed’s feed is an example. It has the option to comment/reply to an object and group the discussion under a single parent. It has the length (timeline) and width (reply ”timeline”). Personally, I enjoyed this type better, because unlike BBS, there’s no sectioning by Twitter. I prefer posting thoughts or sharing things in Twitter rather than having timeline dominated by replies. Friendfeed’s approach is part to blame on :P
But really, it’s a lot more comfortable that way, like Windows 7’s new taskbar grouped instances of different windows under same icon *winks*

True threaded BBS, where there’s a clear structure for reply-of-reply… what do you think? 2.5 dimensional, or 3 dimensional?

And in spirit of “what’s next”, what do you think of the next dimension in discussion? I don’t have strong visualization of it, but maybe, no… not the jargon “real-time” that’s popular recently, instead I think of, interlinking cross-platform discussion.
Some of it is visible now, with plug in like BackType can pull replies from Friendfeed, Twitter, etc. for a blog post. But we still can’t… for example.

Ann replied a blog article in Twitter, then Bob, seeing from his Tumblr make a reply blog post to it. This post by Bob can then be read as part of response to the original article, and received by Ann without the need of Bob to cross-post his response either manually or automatically.

Sounds impossible in the walled ecosystem of now though, and would give a headache if we try imagining the thousands of web services interlinking like the world wide web is not enough of a cobweb already.

BTW, I never tried Google Wave, so I don’t know how that thing would fit in (and no, I don’t know anything more than keywords: “Google, Wave, XMPP, real-time, collaboration, how is it relevant”).